Society & Culture

Marriage

Society & Culture

Posted by: grajac

23rd Sep 2011 05:57pm

Should a new word be made for gays to marry and have the same rights as a male and female who marry --- gayiage???


Comments 33

squeekums
  • 10th Sep 2013 03:05pm

First up the first post Highly offensive

Second here an idea. Scrap the term marriage, make all couples gay and straight civil unions at the registary and if you wish to have religion or fluffy BS part of your union, have another ceremony after that has no legal side at all
Easy fix

Sonnie
  • 10th Jul 2013 05:31pm

No! I think marriage is marriage is marriage. And for all those who are against same sex marriage two thoughts for you. First, many same sex couples stay together longer than "man and wife" marriages and secondly, what would Jesus say if he were here now?

Pops
  • 8th Jan 2013 07:26pm

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

wonder2009
  • 7th Jun 2012 12:05pm

What's the big deal anyway? And judging from some of the responses on here, homophobia is alive and well unfortunately. Focus your energy on more important issues; infact, mind your own business! If two people, whether hetero or homosexual want to show their love for each other..LET THEM! It's not anyone's place to judge.

Move on!

Ganic12
  • 2nd Mar 2012 12:45pm

Gay people would have all equal rights no doubt, but I couldn't call their relationship as marriage. It would be called as sort of civil union which needs to be legalized by law. It cannot be seen exactly same as heterosexual marriage.

gill64
  • 18th Feb 2012 06:31am

no everyone has the right to be classed as legally married no matter what sex you are the world is changing people keep up

gill64
  • 18th Feb 2012 06:28am

no i think everyone has the right to be legally married no matter what their sex is it,s time the world got updated

washann
  • 18th Feb 2012 12:41am

It all boils down to a human being. Does it really matter their sexual preference? I would rather two people were happily in blissful love and knew how to communicate with each other to sort out their problems than the amount of broken marriages/relationships we have with male/female unions.

beth
  • 25th Jan 2012 10:40am

yes i believe gays (sorry if that offends anyone) should be legally allowed to marry, that is who they are and who they chose to be if we do not let them be who they are what are we really saying?

just because there not the same as many of us doesn't mean they have to get punished for being that way.....everyone is different why are we demanding that they change their outlook on people and ways just because what its unacceptable, its not.... were unacceptable by the way we've been acting towards them.

Sarahg8
  • 19th Dec 2011 11:15pm

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

annacathryn
  • 17th Jan 2012 05:11pm
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

The bible also says that women shouldn't wear men's clothing (and vice versa). On this basis I take it you would never dream of wearing trousers?

So how about you move on from a book that is full of contradictions and irrelevance?

Gay people should have every right to marry and I am glad that Australia is finally taking steps to make this happen.

lalise
  • 19th Dec 2011 03:42pm

I personally like "Domestic Partnership" on "Lifetime Partnership" and should apply to both homosexual and heterosexual partnerships.

paradox
  • 20th Nov 2011 02:48pm

grajac, I would not believe too much of what Julia has to say on anything!!!!!!!!!!!

grajac
  • 17th Nov 2011 05:19pm

Even the prime Minister sees the difference

grajac
  • 10th Nov 2011 05:10pm

If you don't know the difference between a gay relationshio and a heterosexual relationsip your education in relationships and between the parties is sadly lacking, gays are quite entiled to have a method of "cementing" their relationship in the same way as hetrosexaul couples but marriage has always meant "a reltaionship between different sexes",. Gays are entiled to have the same rights under the law as "straights.

errolsyd
  • 28th Jan 2013 10:49pm
"Marriage has always mean a relationship between different sexes". Well Grajac, if we went by what has "always meant" then presumably slavery would still be rife and women would not have the vote....

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

paradox
  • 20th Nov 2011 02:46pm
"Marriage has always mean a relationship between different sexes". Well Grajac, if we went by what has "always meant" then presumably slavery would still be rife and women would not have the vote....

Hi annacathryn, Thank you for supplying the link. I do note that the votes are divided into political party bases and can therefore not be a reliable source of trends. Labour and Greens are at 71 and 86% and LNP at 50%. That is not even a national poll!!! But hey, you want to be a couple, fine but don't ask my approval. The trend these days seems to be to cohabit and be a partnership rather than a marriage. But then what do I know, I'm married for 45 years and have lived a sheltered life.

annacathryn
  • 15th Nov 2011 03:32pm
If you don't know the difference between a gay relationshio and a heterosexual relationsip your education in relationships and between the parties is sadly lacking, gays are quite entiled to...

"Marriage has always mean a relationship between different sexes". Well Grajac, if we went by what has "always meant" then presumably slavery would still be rife and women would not have the vote. It's time for change. And apparently 62% of Australians agree with me:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/voter-opinion-adds-weight-to-shift-in-marriage-policy-20111114-1nfkj.html

Anonymous
  • 6th Nov 2011 11:34pm

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

errolsyd
  • 28th Jan 2013 10:37pm
If you don't know the difference between a gay relationshio and a heterosexual relationsip your education in relationships and between the parties is sadly lacking, gays are quite entiled to...

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

annacathryn
  • 12th Oct 2011 11:57am

Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

Minaki
  • 26th Jun 2013 12:43pm
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

There are hetero couples who are like this too. All those kids raised in non-loving and abusive homes, as well as people who stay in their marriages because of money, for the social status afraid to leave etc. How many couples do you know where one puts the other down in public and you know they don't like each other very much let alone love each other you often think "why are they together" ?

Lots of people in marriages don't take responsibility for themselves or their children, but you can't ban these people from marrying.

errolsyd
  • 28th Jan 2013 10:41pm
Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

Anonymous
  • 17th Jan 2012 08:05am
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

I understand your perspective. But I have also seen many hetrosexual relationships in exactly the same boat. And your comments on homosexual couples raising children is very hurtful. I'm have been in a Civil Union with my wife for over one year now. (a Civil Union is a agreement similar to the marriage agreement.) Are you aware how difficult it is for a homosexual couple to have a child. Lesbians have to go through months of tests to find out if they are physically able to carry children before the health system will even consider putting them on the list for the few procedures available for AI. There is also the mine field of finding donars. Then there is the heart ache of each attempt that doesn't work, plus the thousands of dollars forked out for these procedures. I understand that many heterosexual couples go through similar conception problems. Please understand that we walked into our 'marriage' knowing the heartache and the struggles we would go through before we were blessed with a child. Anyone that has been through it would understand that its not a choice made lightly. So please consider the possibility that you have only encountered the immature stereotypical "gay scene" gays. and not the rest of us that just want to live a normal life with our partners.

annacathryn
  • 10th Nov 2011 10:03am
I do not want to be considered gay as it is a very different relationshio to a relationship between a man and a woman

I'm not sure I understand what you mean grajac. If you're heterosexual why would you be considered gay?

Nor do I understand your comment about gay relationships being very different to a relationship between a man and a woman. In what sense? Surely all relationships are very different? I know that my heterosexual relationship with my partner is very different to that of my parents' marriage for example. And different again to many of my friends' relationships.

annacathryn
  • 10th Nov 2011 10:03am
I do not want to be considered gay as it is a very different relationshio to a relationship between a man and a woman

I'm not sure I understand what you mean grajac. If you're heterosexual why would you be considered gay?

Nor do I understand your comment about gay relationships being very different to a relationship between a man and a woman. In what sense? Surely all relationships are very different? I know that my heterosexual relationship with my partner is very different to that of my parents' marriage for example. And different again to many of my friends' relationships.

Lilly Legs
  • 8th Nov 2011 03:12pm
Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

That is so true. You cant help who you love and if its the same sex it shouldnt matter

grajac
  • 7th Nov 2011 01:03pm
Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

I do not want to be considered gay as it is a very different relationshio to a relationship between a man and a woman

annacathryn
  • 19th Oct 2011 10:13am
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

Timbo, perhaps you haven't met many homosexual couples. You certainly shouldn't make such a blanket judgement based solely on your own personal experience. As with heterosexual couples, some homosexuals are in loving, enduring and mutually supportive relationships, some are not. I, for one, would rather see a child grow up in a caring and positive environment with two gay parents than in a hostile and destructive "straight" household. But regardless, this is not all about children, it's about marriage. One does not necessarily equal the other. I am in a committed heterosexual relationship and neither of us want marriage or children. It is entirely personal choice and that, coupled with the freedom to exercise this personal choice, is what it's all about.

Timbo
  • 19th Oct 2011 09:58am
Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

errolsyd
  • 8th Oct 2011 09:53pm

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

chrissy69
  • 6th Oct 2015 12:14pm
Why does there need to be a new word? I think gay people in a loving relationship have every right to marry. Call it a marriage. It should be no different to a hetrosexual marriage.

This comment has been removed by a moderator as it violates terms & conditions of the Cafestudy forums.

Anonymous
  • 6th Nov 2011 11:35pm
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules.

GOT ME CONVINCED!

Help Caféstudy members by responding to their questions, or ask your own in Café Chat, and you will get the chance of earning extra rewards. Caféstudy will match these and donate equally to our two chosen Australian charities.

AMCS
Australian Marine Conservation Society are an independent charity, staffed by a committed group of scientists, educators and passionate advocates who have defended Australia’s oceans for over 50 years.
Reach Out
ReachOut is the most accessed online mental health service for young people and their parents in Australia. Their trusted self-help information, peer-support program and referral tools save lives by helping young people be well and stay well. The information they offer parents makes it easier for them to help their teenagers, too.